AI/IA

Policy and Regulatory Frameworks

Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

The EU AI Act

  • First comprehensive AI regulation in the world
  • Adopted by European Parliament in March 2024
  • Risk-based approach to AI regulation
  • Focuses on transparency, safety, and fundamental rights
  • "Brussels Effect": Influence on other jurisdictions, including Colorado
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

EU AI Act: Risk Categories

The Act classifies AI systems based on risk level:

  • Unacceptable Risk: Banned outright (e.g., social scoring, manipulative AI)
  • High Risk: Strict requirements (e.g., critical infrastructure, education, hiring)
  • Limited Risk: Transparency obligations (e.g., chatbots, emotion recognition)
  • Minimal Risk: Minimal regulation (most AI applications)
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

EU AI Act: High-Risk Use Cases

The following AI applications are considered high-risk and subject to strict requirements:

  • Biometrics: Remote identification systems, categorization systems, emotion recognition
  • Critical Infrastructure: Safety components for traffic, utilities, digital infrastructure
  • Education: Systems determining access to education, evaluating outcomes, monitoring tests
  • Employment: Recruitment tools, task allocation, performance monitoring, promotion/termination
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

EU AI Act: High-Risk Use Cases

  • Essential Services: Eligibility assessment for benefits, credit scoring, insurance pricing
  • Law Enforcement: Crime risk assessment, evidence reliability evaluation, profiling
  • Migration & Border Control: Risk assessments, application examination, identification
  • Justice & Democracy: Legal interpretation, dispute resolution, election influence
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

EU AI Act: What must you do if you're 'high-risk'?

  • Establish a risk management system throughout the lifecycle
  • Implement data governance - test for representativeness in datasets; "to the best extent possible", free of errors
  • Create detailed technical documentation for others to determine compliance and risk
  • Design systems for automatic record-keeping of risk-relevant events
  • Provide clear instructions for use to downstream deployers
  • Enable human oversight in system design
  • Ensure appropriate accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity
  • Establish a quality management system for compliance
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

EU AI Act: Foundation Model Requirements

Special provisions for general-purpose AI models (GPAIs):

  • Technical documentation and risk assessments
  • Copyright compliance for training data
  • Energy efficiency reporting
  • Stricter rules for "systemic risk" models ("when the cumulative amount of compute used for its training is greater than floating point operations")

"Free and open licence GPAI model providers only need to comply with copyright and publish the training data summary, unless they present a systemic risk."

Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

Discussion

  • What are the potential positive impacts of the legislation as implemented in the EU AI Act?
  • What are the potential concerns the EU AI Act?
  • Who benefits? Who is harmed?
Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

Lab: AI Policy Framework

Lab Details

Policy and Regulatory Frameworks
AI/IA

References

Policy and Regulatory Frameworks